Foundations of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Foundations of Criminal truth - Assignment ExampleJail for Sainsburys IT boss who take 17 million Nectar Points. This grapheme talks about James Stevenson who was an IT manager liable of stealing 17 million Necta points was found guilty and jailed for 20 years. According to the United Kingdom Federal Law addressing the concept of theft, it was very right to take that legal action because Mr. Stevenson served the IT Comp each with self-centeredness, where he never minded(p) about the firm or the involved parties. The UK Federal Law clearly states that nobody should serve own(prenominal) interest or engage in some form of corruption when working in a public office, company or private sectors. In this case, justice was acquired to the firm and the involved parties because Stevenson deserved the sentence. The mash found him guilty of having stolen the IT Companys money by serving his own interest. The legal reward here is that Stevenson had stolen millions of Necta Points that be longed to the Company and the fact that he was jailed served him right. The father of two, of Muswell Hill, north London, confessed employing some of the money to defile ?8, 120 worth of products from the store. However, after calculations were carried out with all the evidences analysed keenly, Mr. Stevenson was found guilty and that was a fare apprehension particularly when examined from the sentence point of view. The UK Fraud Law was keenly observed and justice done to the firm. The identification of this case by this article is accurate, clear and complete in the sense that it explains all concepts openly and clearly in a way that one can understand well. Policeman stole ?70,000 in commits parody to fund affair with fellow officer... but walks scanty from court (Daily Mail On-Line 22 February 2012) This case involves a police officer who financed an extramarital affair using fraudulently raking in ?70, 000 in bank loans. After the judged heard his cases keenly, he brande d him as emotionally fragile and the man just walked free from the court. PC Jamie Hillman who is 37 swindled more than 6 different high street banks, engrossing Northern shudder and Barclays, through application for loans and credit cards (McQueeeney, 2012). According to me, this judgment was wrong in the sense that what Hillman was doing is altogether stealing from banks. This is because the legal issue outlined is theft because taking a persons prop or item without his or her knowledge is stealing. It does not matter who he served or how he use the money but the bottom line is that he was stealing. According to the United Kingdom Fraud law, any form of stealing from a business individual or organization demands that the individual involved be jailed because that is against the law. The fact that Hillman used false claims at the application of these loans including an open lie that he was a sergeant in the Metropolitan Police and even that he was a soldier serving in Afghanista n, makes him guilty and he deserved to be jailed (McQueeeney, 2012). Despite the fact that he might fork up used the money to finance double life, he used a certain subdivision of it to serve his own interest what makes it clear stealing intentions. Therefore, this judgment was not right because the banks from which he stole never received justice they deserved. The legal issue, which is theft, was not attended to. Moreover, the judge sent him to prison for 12 months if indeed he was